Trump’s ‘disappointed’ with Keir Starmer – welcome to our world | World | News

Carole Malone, centre, is fuming that the PM’s love of international law is damaging UK-US relations (Image: Getty)
Donald Trump says he’s “very disappointed” with Keir Starmer. “It’s not Churchill we’re dealing with.” Yes, well welcome to our world Mr Trump – we’re disappointed by this wet wipe of a Prime Minister every day of the week.
Never more so than this week, when he relegated Britain to being an irrelevance on the world stage, which will never again be taken seriously as a military power. As the bombs rained down on Tehran at the weekend, a terrified Starmer stood quivering on the sidelines, squealing “nothing to do with us” as the US and Israel went head-to-head with one of the world’s foremost state sponsors of terrorism.
While other countries rallied around America and Israel, voicing support for their allies, our pearl-clutching Prime Minister ran to his old mate, the Attorney General Lord Hermer, and begged him for some ironclad get-out clause in international law that would mean he could run and hide from this conflict.
And of course, Hermer, the man who’s well used to defending terrorists, was all too happy to find one. But as lawyers, both Starmer and Hermer know full well that international law is a dead duck. It means nothing. It’s just a set of rules and agreements between nations about how they should behave – and many no longer even pretend to stick to the agreements.
More importantly, the world has changed. Conflicts have changed, as have the dangers facing us – so, yes, past agreements need to change too – especially when the West is under threat of extinction from Islamist lunatics.

Keir Starmer leaves the room after failing to support US-Israel attack on Iran at the weekend (Image: Getty)
Thanks to Hermer’s legal get-out, Starmer was able to hide under the sofa as the weekend’s bombardment of Iran reached fever pitch, while two other countries with leaders way braver than him were out there defending our interests as well as their own against a murderous terrorist aggressor.
You all know the story of what happened – Trump had asked for access to the Diego Garcia military airbase, on the Chagos Islands, and others, in order to attack Tehran and Starmer had initially said a flat no.
And despite the fact he must’ve known for weeks these attacks were coming, he had no clue what to do or say. So, he made some drippy speech to the nation reading words from an autocue that someone else had written for him the gist of which was “we weren’t involved in this”.
He then compounded the damage by saying again he thought the attack, which killed the Ayatollah, was illegal and that Britain wouldn’t participate in US-led attempts to bring about “regime change from the skies”.
It’s a good job Winston Churchill didn’t say that during World War 2, because the Nazis would have taken Europe. It’s a good job Margaret Thatcher didn’t when she saved the Falklands.
It would have cost Starmer nothing to have said an immediate yes when Trump made the request. It was the US and Israel doing all the heavy lifting, and all Starmer was asked to do was give access to our air bases.
But no, the man whose goolies are firmly in the grip of his party’s hard Left, tried to appease them AND this country’s Muslims, whom he thinks will keep him in power.
As usual, he ended up pleasing no one. His party and the liberal Left hate him for not properly condemning the attack on Iran, and the rest of us, who see the dangers of Iran, despise him for the fact that he’s a gutless coward who’s not fit to lead a Boy Scouts troop – let alone a once-great country that was Britain.

The PM has belatedly allowed the US to use UK bases, thought to include RAF Fairford (Image: Getty)
Funny isn’t it that Starmer and the liberal loons can condemn the Ayatollah as being “utterly abhorrent”. They can condemn his murderous regime, yet all of them were prepared to let the slaughter this regime inflicted in Iran – and on the rest of the world – continue unabated.
None of them were, or are, prepared to do a damn thing about it. How can you condemn the wholesale slaughter of the Iranian people yet not be prepared to lift a finger to stop it? How can you acknowledge that this regime was a clear and present danger to the world order – yet do nothing to stop it? And worse, you then condemn the people who are risking everything to stop it.
Look at the moronic Greens’ boss Zack Polanski, who called the US and Israel “rogue states” this week and demanded that Starmer condemn them. This is the fool who thinks tyrants like the Ayatollah and Putin can be talked round. And we’re supposed to listen to this gap-toothed loon who, not so long ago, was hypnotising women to think their breasts were bigger.
No one wants another Iraq war, but sometimes war – or a type of war – has to happen to make the world safer. And sometimes countries have to do the right thing, whatever the fine print of international law says.
In trying to hinder the efforts of our closest ally, Starmer has damaged this country more than people know. Because now the so-called ‘special relationship’ really is in the toilet.
Trump is raging, and he has every right to be. The first time he asks Starmer for a favour – a favour to help him rid the world of a despotic tyrant who was planning to build nuclear weapons to destroy the West – the gutless Starmer says no.
He wasn’t being asked to deploy troops or to send weapons – just for the use of our airbases. A real leader would have seen the bigger picture here and said yes – not least because MI5 has foiled 20 Iranian regime-based terror plots here in the last three years. Not least because we already have Iranian hit squads in Britain with the explicit aim of assassinating British citizens, they deem to be enemies.
There are already aggressive Iranian intelligence services in this country planning attacks on British soil as we speak. Yet our Prime Minister’s response is to run and hide from the threat.

A US jet landing on a carrier in the Arabian gulf during Operation Epic Fury (Image: Getty)
Starmer would rather appease his Labour backbenchers, who hate the US and Israel, and his Muslim voters, than put the safety and security of this country first.
The man’s an abject fool, and we’re all going to pay the price for his stupidity and his cowardice because already the Republicans and the US media are lining up against Starmer and asking what the hell is wrong with our country. They’re also saying we should no longer be considered an ally.
And if that comes to pass – God help us. Because while the goons and the liberal Left will be cheering, they won’t be cheering when we get attacked and no one comes to help us.
And Starmer can wave goodbye to his precious Chagos deal now, because Trump will not support it after this. Make no mistake, that’s a good thing, but getting out of this idiotic deal is going to cost British taxpayers billions.
We can only thank God that Starmer’s time in power will soon be over – the man is an appeaser, a capitulator, a “Chamberlain” in a suit that was bought for him by someone else. Which makes him a danger to each and every one of us.


