Scientists claim Jesus ‘wasn’t called Jesus’ and went by another name | World | News
Scholars and scientists are challenging a centuries-old belief, claiming that Jesus Christ, the central figure of Christianity, was not actually called “Jesus.”
Historical and linguistic evidence suggests that the Son of God would have gone by a different name entirely, one rooted in the language of his time.
According to experts, Jesus’ name in his native Aramaic, the language he likely spoke, would have been “Yeshua” or possibly its shorter form, “Yeshu.”
This discovery has led scholars to argue that the name “Jesus” emerged through a long process of translation.
Professor Dineke Houtman of the Protestant Theological University in the Netherlands explained: “His name would probably have been in Aramaic: Yeshua.
“It is likely that this is also how he introduced himself. Another possibility is the shorter form Yeshu, which is used in later rabbinic literature.”
Professor Candida Moss, an expert on early Christianity from the University of Birmingham, supported this claim, noting that Yeshua or Yeshu were among the most common names in first-century Galilee.
The name “Jesus” was shaped by historical translation over centuries. Initially, his name would have transitioned from Aramaic into Hebrew, Greek, and Latin before evolving into “Jesus” in English by the 16th century.
The letter “J,” as pronounced in modern English, did not even exist in the alphabet during Jesus’ time.
Furthermore, “Christ” was not a surname but a title derived from the Greek word “Christos,” meaning “anointed one.”
His full name in historical context would have likely been something like “Yeshu Nazareen,” reflecting his connection to his hometown of Nazareth.
Though the revelation may seem surprising, many theologians believe it doesn’t diminish Jesus’ significance. The translation of his name into different languages reflects the global spread of Christianity, making him accessible to diverse cultures.
Professor Lawrence Mykytiuk of Purdue University, Indiana, notes the broader historical context: “The name is less important than the message and impact of his life and teachings.”
Jesus is believed to have been born around 6 to 4 BC, with March being a likely timeframe for his birth.
